This is the Social History of Knowledge’s real value: as with any history, we
are better-equipped to see continuity in our surroundings, which tempers our
over-enthused or doomsayer reactions with an appropriate amount of perspective.
Perhaps Chapple might have augmented her study by reviewing the literature on
mechanics’ institutes from the Industrial Revolution; maybe van Dijk’s
conclusions about the elites in a networked society would have been different
if he had looked at the problem through a postcolonial lens. Although Burke says
little of Wikipedia or the rest of the Internet, his book makes clear that he
doesn’t need to--it’s all been said before.
No comments:
Post a Comment